SIMS Trace Element Analyses
-
-
A powerful feature of the SIMS technique is its intrinsically low detection
limits. SIMS can determine the concentrations of most elements at abundances
down to 10 ppb or lower. There are a number of factors which must be balanced
against each other when designing a new analytical protocol. These factors
include:
-
approximate concentration of the target element(s)
-
which elements are being analyzed for and which isobaric interferences
may be present
-
number of elements which need to be analyzed for
-
amount of time to be spent on the analysis (generally a project funding
issue)
-
how precise the data need to be in order to answer the analytical question
-
what spatial resolution is required
-
are suitable calibration standards available (matrix and concentration
matched)
-
Secondary ion yields -- the fraction of the ions sputtered from the sample
which are ejected from the samples as ion -- are a function both of the
element being detected and the nature of the sample's crystallographic
structure. Thus quantitative SIMS trace element analyses are critically
dependent on having a well characterized standard which is closely matrix
matched to the sample material which can be used for calibrating the elemental
yields during each analytical session: when analyzing the trace element
composition of a silica-rich glass is it essential to use a silica-rich
calibration standard, when analyzing a Fe-Ni alloy it is critical to use
a Fe-Ni alloy calibration standard, etc. It is also advantageous to have
similar concentrations of the target element(s) in both the calibration
standard and the samples. Multiple standards with differing trace element
abundances are valuable for assessing the presence of isobaric interferences.
Finally, for those materials which possess significant solid solution variabilities
in their major element contents (e.g., glasses or alloys) it is valuable
to have multiple standards for mapping out how the secondary ion yields
of a specific element vary with variations in major element composition.
-
-
SIMS trace element analyses measure the ratio of of the target element
and a selected major element. This must be done in both the standard and
in the sample. It is then possible to calculate the absolute concentration
of the target element in the sample using the following example for calculating
the arsenic concentration in a silicate glass:
-
-
To determine the concentration of arsenic (green)
in a sample of 'unknown' concentration it is necessary to know each of
the concentrations or ion ratios which are show in red.
For samples which have heterogeneous major element compositions it is necessary
to electron probe the the individual crystal domain prior to SIMS analysis.
This approach includes the assumption that the isotopic composition of
both the target element (in this case, arsenic is mono-isotopic) and the
major element are the same in both the standard and the unknown; if this
is not the case then a correction for isotopic variations must be introduced
into this equation.
-
A drawback of SIMS is the problem of isobaric interferences which are frequently
present in a secondary ion mass spectrum. Of particular significance is
the formation of oxide complexes when measuring positive secondary ions.
As an example, the m/e=56 mass station will detect ions for both the (40Ca+16O)
and the 56Fe; thus the 56Fe isotope would be a poor selection when analyzing
a calcium rich matrix. Two techniques exist for overcoming the spurious
ions produced by such isobaric interferences: (1) energy
filtering and (2) high mass resolution.
-
-
Energy Filtering:
When primary ions interact with the surface of the sample a fraction of
the incoming kinetic energy is transferred to the secondary ions. These
ion leave the sample's surface with an initial velocity (typically less
than 100 electron-Volts) to which the ion probe's secondary extraction
voltage applies an additional component (4500 eV in the case of the Cameca
ims 4f). All species produce fewer high energy ions than low energy ones;
however polyatomic 'cluster' ions (such as 40Ca+160) are less efficient
at generating high energy ions as compared to atomic species. If the machine
is tuned to accept only those secondary ions which, for example, have between
75 to 125 eV of initial energy, it is possible to bias strongly the sampling
in favor of the atomic ions which are ejected from the sample. The disadvantage
of this approach is that high energy offsets result in large decreases
in secondary ion signal intensities.
-
-

-
-
Plot of the energy distributions observed
for an atomic ion (27Al) and molecular ion (Al + O) ejected from a sample
of aluminum metal. These data were collected with a 5 Volt wide energy
acceptance window and the sampling was done at 5 Volt increments. Note
how the intensity of the molecular species decreases much more rapidly
than is the case for the 27Al atomic ion.
-
-
-
-
-
-
High
Mass Resolution: In the case of (40Ca+16O) and 56Fe neither
of these species has a mass of exactly 56.0000. The true masses of these
species are:
-
-
(40Ca+16O) mass = 55.93494 amu
-
56Fe mass = 55.95750 amu
-

-
This small difference of 0.02256 amu can be exploited by the Cameca ims
4f such that the 56Fe ions will be passed through the mass spectrometer
whereas the calcium+oxygen clusters will be rejected due to their lighter
mass. The mass resolving power of a spectrometer is defined as the mass
of the accepted ion ratioed to the total range in masses which the given
machine conditions will permit. For our example, the minimum mass resolving
power required would be:
-
-
M/dM = 55.95750 / 0.02256 = 2480
-
-
If the machine is tuned to a mass resolution of M/dM > 2500 it will be
possible to eliminate the calcium-oxide interference from the iron signal.
The Cameca ims 4f can routinely operate at mass resolutions as high as
M/dM = 5000.
-
By imaging the ions passing through the entrance and exit slits of the
Cameca, it is possible to graphically show the effects of tuning the spectrometer
to high mass resolution.
-
-
Observing the ion count rates as the magnet field intensity is slowly swept
over the mass 56 peak clearly shows that calcium+oxygen interference is
completely resolved from the 56Fe signal.
Demonstration of tuning the Cameca
ims 4f for high mass resolution conditions. Left
Hand Side: analog 'slit' ion images collected
at mass/charge = 56. Right Hand Side:
Cartoons explaining the adjacent ion images. In the cartoons green represents
the 56Fe ions whereas blue represents the calcium-oxide signal. Top
frame shows the system tuned for low mass resolution of M/dM = 300;
the circular shape is generated by a 750 micron contrast aperture located
at the mass spectrometer's entrance slit. Middle frame shows the
condition where the entrance slit has been partially closed which eliminates
the overlap of the two ion species. Bottom frame shows where the
mass spectrometer's exit slit (vertical lines in cartoon) has been partially
shut so as to allow only the Fe ions to pass.
.
Return to SIMS Home Page